29 Jun 2007
Long back I read this on The Mad Momma’s space. Now I have some information about it. Why this very late enlightenment? My simple brain was struck on interpreting, differentiating, comparing, analyzing and completely understanding physcho-analytical developmental theories from big shots like Freud, Piaget, Vygotsky and Bronfenbrenner. All the heavy stuff made me doze off and by the time I finally woke up, a month had passed. We all know the pace at which MM writes. She averages about 5 posts a day and this one, though was just 30 days back, is buried deep in her archives. So MM if you are still interested here is the information.
Signing, in the US, is no longer looked down as something that is restricted to hearing/speech impaired. Of late signing is catching on big time. Day care centers have signing as a part of their curriculum. People are paying tons of money to learn signing with their children.
Advantages of signing – do I have to spell it out? How many days, have I spoken through clenched teeth to toddler/infant in an ominous tone, “Yenna venum-nnu solen? Yen yennai paduthare?” (Meaning: Just tell me what you want. Stop taunting me. Oh – the translation simply does not cut it folks. It does not capture the essence of the dialogue.) So if the child is able to communicate, lesser number of tantrums and life gets simple for the caregiver.
Now to the controversy that clouds signing. Some argue that signing delays speech. That is absolutely right. If your child can satisfy its needs through signs, what is the initiative to make words and sentences?
Now comes the twist. Delay of speech is nothing to be alarmed about. Speech/Language development has always been associated with cognitive (brain) development. So a delay in speech is portrayed with a negative connotation. But language is not just making words and sentences. Language must be viewed as a means of communication. So, the initiative to communicate (in any way, not just through words) must be seen as a cognitive milestone. Otherwise we all have to falsely conclude that all hearing/speech impaired people lack severely in cognitive development.
When a baby is born, she has a few schemas/patterns in her brain. Based on these schemas they react, like they know to root when they are hungry, they know to calm down when they hear their mother’s voice/touch, they posses a sucking instinct. As they grow, as they experience new things, they compare it with their existing schema. For example, when you bring a feeding bottle to the baby, she analyzes with her sense of smell and sense of taste, concludes, “It is milk all right, just in a different form. I already know how to suck from breast. So if I do the same, I must be fine”. So she compares the new experience with her schema and assimilates the new experience in to her schema. When you start feeding the baby from a cup and a spoon, though it is the same milk, it is a totally new experience eating from a spoon. She compares it to her existing schema, gets confused that there is no match and evolves a new schema incorporating the new experience. This is adapting to the new experience.
At one stage the baby realizes that every object in her wold has a ‘name’. THIS correlation is a major milestone and her little brain is working hard, to rewrite a new, slightly complex schema that accommodates this new realization. This correlation occurs irrespective of words+object association or words+sign association. This association takes place much earlier in a baby who uses signs. Also the communication and the gratification because of the communication enriches her experience and her schema is getting more and more complex. On a two year scale, sign language baby vs non-sign language baby, the sign language baby definitly has the cognitive edge.
Sign language baby, after some time realizes that objects can have more than one way of representation – words and signs. Then she rewrites her schema and incorporates words in to her schema.
The flip side to signing is that not many people know how to sign. As MM has pointed out in her post, the baby does get alarmed if she is not able to communicate to a person who is not able to sign.
11 Responses for "Sign Language"
I know, I had said something similar in response to that post by MM, but my comment got swallowed by Blogger. I should have done a post but I could not have analysed this better than you have !
You deserve your title of a thinking blogger !
Thanks Poppin’s Mom. Would love to hear your view also. Do a post when you get a chance.
you seem to analyse every thing and also bring it out well in words
thanks for an informative post. I think sign language in part is good. I mean, Ashu talks in Tamil and no one understands her here but shes getting by and would soon learn English too. (I hope!) So now you cant say she has English language speech delay right? RIGHT?
Don’t even worry about it. When Toddler started day care, she didn’t know one word of Spanish. But now she speaks fluent spanish at her day care, only at her day care, mind you. At home she tests some words, phrases with me and uses them only if she thinks I understand them. So they figure out languages, subtleness and nuances at a speed that will amaze you!
As usual, a well researched and educative post…
Very well analyzed post. Never once occured there is so much to it
my kids too rely on sign more.. probably we speak multiple languages at home that’s why
Kowsalya, Kiran, RBDANS thanks.
ITW,that is very true.
and you didnt tell me? i just bumped into this by mistake…. well written
Very interesting. I learnt so much from this.
If possible could you do a post on mastering 2 languages, if you have some infortmation on it.
I despair of Akhil speaking in Tamil no, tho he understands perfectly. He started off as an avid tamil talker, and once he started school he switched to English totally. How to get him to be fluent in Tamil again? Any ideas?
Leave a reply